Climbing seems to be full of things that don’t make sense. A few of the more perplexing paradoxes in our sport:
The steeper a cliff gets, the safer the falls. So why do steep routes generally have bolts fairly close together, while slabs, which are not fun to fall on (and may even be dangerous), generally don’t offer much in the way of protection? Even when they ARE bolted, the bolts are usually few and far between. So when it’s dangerous, we run it out, and when it’s safe, we grid bolt. With that kind of logic we should be in politics!
The description in the the guidebook read “this route gets a little sporty moving from the crack onto the face.” A new comer might think that was a good thing, as sport climbing general means routes that are safely protected by bolts, but “sporty” really means it’s going to be exciting! I’m guessing this comes from a time when climbing was still considered more of a “game,” and something that was “sporting” was in good style? I don’t know, any input on this one?
Have you ever brushed the holds on a really popular route you were working on? It’s amazing how much texture is hiding under those layers of chalk! At least slippery holds make us stronger, which is nice.
We rolled into Creek Pasture late one night, and were a bit taken aback by how many people were camping there. Now, if we knew all those people, we be like, “Oh cool, Johnny and Chris made it.” But instead our gut reaction is, man, why are there so many people here? I guess I have a lot of friends to make so everyone can be in the “in” crowd.
Much like Newton’s Third Law, I don’t understand how or why, but I do know that it’s true. And while maybe not as often, sometimes 10+ is waaaay harder than 11a.
Actually, this makes sense to me. If we are outside, we are happy. If we are inside, stuck in front of a glowing screen, we are mean. Seems pretty simple to me. Outside = good, glowing screen = bad.
Any other big ones out there you can think of?
Hayden Carpenter and Tom Bohanon recently repeated an obscure ice climb on the south side of Mt Sopris. Given a brief mention in Jack Robert’s ice guide, Bulldog Creek Walk is described as being 100 meters of WI 4. What they found was seven pitches of ice in a remote setting that makes for one […]
-Roofs have the cleanest, safest falls but are generally the most intimidating.
Oh and this one- this one is huge:
I think I may present this socio-pyschological phenomenon to MIT or Harvard or something. I call it ‘short term ability memory’ wherein you can go and get shut down for an entire afternoon/weekend with absolutely no hope of sending a project that is completely out of your range and the second you get back to camp you immediately ‘realize’ that it isn’t actually that difficult and that you are surely capable of sending. Rinse repeat. It also applies to watching pros climb on the worlds hardest rigs and thinking to yourself ‘those holds look pretty positive…’
NIce post, BJ. I like this. Technically, these observations are more ironic than they are “paradoxes,” but semantics aside, I like your thoughts.
How about; the older and more experienced you get, the less likely you are to do risky things.
The more bucks you get from your sponsors to be famous climbers and travel the world, the more you just want to stay home and go to Rifle.
The more you climb on one project, the weaker you get
Good point, title updated! And those are great!
Don’t know whether this is paradox or irony but the fact is that “classic” routes often are the least pleasant to climb owing to crowds, polish, etc.
I wonder at what point do classic routes lose their “classic” status because they have been loved to death? Incredible Hand Crack really isn’t all that incredible anymore, I’m sure there are many others we could come up with. I can only imagine what some of the Rifle “warm ups” were like before a gazillion ascents turned them to glass.
Those “warm ups” were probably what Hogwarts and the Distllery are today, fresh, sporty and no polish!